| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Kate stark
834
   |
Posted - 2013.11.08 22:47:00 -
[1] - Quote
Brusanan wrote:Stop derailing the thread by focusing on what was obviously a troll instead of the dangerous precedent that CCP could be setting here.
you say that like CCP care about setting dangerous and dumb precedents.
see the sticky that has been abandoned for nearly a month. |
Kate stark
836
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 23:02:00 -
[2] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:Honestly, y'all need to chill.
So some nub that Erotica managed to scam (or however he managed to get the API) got some SP. What's this guy gonna do, fit t2 mining lasers to his hulk? The SP is non-transferable.
Going over every tiny interaction CCP has with its player base will accomplish nothing, it will only deaden the communication channels that exist between the player base and the devs.
think you've pretty much missed the point. |
Kate stark
837
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 23:10:00 -
[3] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:I just don't think that it's worth picking this particular fight with CCP at this particular time.
i disagree.
an issue is an issue. the date on a calendar isn't going to change that. |
Kate stark
837
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 23:11:00 -
[4] - Quote
Darius JOHNSON wrote:Nathalie LaPorte wrote:Darius JOHNSON wrote:
If you don't know CCP's policies well enough to know that they can't discuss this with you then perhaps you should spend more time understanding what you're mad about before you get mad about it and act the fool. The fact that as best as I can tell you're all lowest denominator eve bottom feeders only makes your apparent sense of entitlement more interesting.
Keep spewing out insults while calling everyone else mad, it's a good look. It's not an insult. It's a statement of fact. There sure are a lot of hurt NPC corp characters in this thread!
i've never understood the relevance of your corp in relation to forum posts. |
Kate stark
837
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 23:12:00 -
[5] - Quote
ElQuirko wrote:Darius JOHNSON wrote:ElQuirko wrote:Darius JOHNSON wrote:I don't even know what the hell that second bit is supposed to mean. Go back to school, take some English lessons. You don't seem to be able to comprehend much of what is said, despite its perfectly passable language. There was nothing passable about this sentence. Just stop. Let's play "spot the error".
the whole thread, it would seem. |
Kate stark
837
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 23:18:00 -
[6] - Quote
Darius JOHNSON wrote:Kate stark wrote:Darius JOHNSON wrote:Nathalie LaPorte wrote:Darius JOHNSON wrote:
If you don't know CCP's policies well enough to know that they can't discuss this with you then perhaps you should spend more time understanding what you're mad about before you get mad about it and act the fool. The fact that as best as I can tell you're all lowest denominator eve bottom feeders only makes your apparent sense of entitlement more interesting.
Keep spewing out insults while calling everyone else mad, it's a good look. It's not an insult. It's a statement of fact. There sure are a lot of hurt NPC corp characters in this thread! i've never understood the relevance of your corp in relation to forum posts. The perception is that if a character is actively in a corp with some kind of history it's not just the OP's 7 alts pretend raging in order to give the appearance of scandal in their manufactured drama thread. :edit: whether that's actually the case or not. That's the perception.
so it's just the fallback comment for people who have no real point to make but want to post anyway? |
Kate stark
839
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 23:31:00 -
[7] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:Agent Kailethre wrote:
If we don't show up and yell at CCP that they're doing something wrong, then how will they ever know they've done wrong? We need to let them know, or let the game slowly begin to wither and die.
Alright, lets pretend your rearing a child. Do you yell at them for every little trivial mistake they make? No, you quietly correct them and only yell at them for the big mistakes, because those lessons really matter and need to stick. If you yell at them for every little thing, each day, every day they become accustomed to your yelling. It becomes background noise, they ignore it. We just had massive fcking forum shtstorms regarding gold magnates, massive favoritism, and RMT on the eve of the release of Rubicon. Also some EULA stuff too. That stuff was kinda important. This stuff? Peanuts. So some fool that got scammed (or otherwise convinced to give over his API to erotica) got some SP. So what? Oh noes, he'll have a better refine rate or t2 minning crystals or whatever. Small time, barely affecting one player, in a game with problems that affect thousands. This triviality isn't worth it.
you're right, that stuff was important.
it's a shame CCP decided to not give a ****, provide 0 worthwhile response, and have ignored the issue for the last 3 weeks.
maybe if we point out they are systematically and repeatedly ******* up, they might realise we have legitimate concerns. |
Kate stark
842
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 23:42:00 -
[8] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:The gold magnates were stopped. The RMT was closed down ....slowly (oh, and ccp, fck you for giving somer 10 days to cash out their RMT op). The massive favoritism happened, but we made a huge stink and it may be a while before it happens again.
The forums do have some small influence. It's not worth expending it on some worthless triviality just so Erotica has higher visibility before his run for CSM.
RMT was never an issue we cared about. except CCP moving goalposts because "RMT" got popular. that was more favouritism again. allowing one group of players to do something until they all do it.
favouritism, the issue that has yet to be addressed, which is pretty much the same issue here. taking one subset of players and treating them differently to the rest of the playerbase.
CCP are simply inconsistent in it's enforcement of the rules. |
Kate stark
846
|
Posted - 2013.11.09 07:50:00 -
[9] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:Kate stark wrote:
CCP are simply inconsistent in it's enforcement of the rules.
Tell me something, do you think an organization that is "inconsistent in it's enforcement of the rules" will somehow change its inconsistency based off of one trivially insignificant case? Do you honestly think that such an inconsistent organization uses such trivial events as precedents for later action? CCP doesn't follow precedent, never has. Don't believe me? They flip-flop on whether a dozen decloak cans on a gate is either allowed or a bannable repeat offense on an almost weekly basis. CCP does not follow precedent on anything. If they did, they would never have given out rare blueprints again after T20.
and that's the reason for the thread. people are sick and tired of this inconsistency. |
Kate stark
857
|
Posted - 2013.11.10 15:42:00 -
[10] - Quote
if this never happened then surely this thread would have been locked by now with a post saying so, because rumourmongering is against the rules of the forum.
hence we can conclude it's not a rumour as the thread remains unlocked, and is indeed something that happened. |
| |
|